Comments on: Linux NAT with one network interface? http://www.miljan.org/main/2006/12/26/linux-nat-with-one-network-interface/ Wisdom is the key Thu, 17 Feb 2011 19:54:39 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4 By: miljan http://www.miljan.org/main/2006/12/26/linux-nat-with-one-network-interface/comment-page-1/#comment-305 miljan Thu, 08 Feb 2007 10:56:08 +0000 http://www.miljan.org/main/2006/12/26/linux-nat-with-one-network-interface/#comment-305 Nije to Linux, to je Fedora! :-p Nije to Linux, to je Fedora! :-p

]]> By: bc http://www.miljan.org/main/2006/12/26/linux-nat-with-one-network-interface/comment-page-1/#comment-303 bc Thu, 08 Feb 2007 10:45:15 +0000 http://www.miljan.org/main/2006/12/26/linux-nat-with-one-network-interface/#comment-303 lol linux lolololol pa crni miljane!!!! lol linux lolololol

pa crni miljane!!!!

]]> By: miljan http://www.miljan.org/main/2006/12/26/linux-nat-with-one-network-interface/comment-page-1/#comment-299 miljan Tue, 26 Dec 2006 23:34:20 +0000 http://www.miljan.org/main/2006/12/26/linux-nat-with-one-network-interface/#comment-299 From security point of view, I agree with you Данило. Since it is not a privileged port there is no need for root here, but it looks so much more k00l this way, don’t you think? :-))) From security point of view, I agree with you Данило. Since it is not a privileged port there is no need for root here, but it looks so much more k00l this way, don’t you think? :-)))

]]> By: Данило http://www.miljan.org/main/2006/12/26/linux-nat-with-one-network-interface/comment-page-1/#comment-296 Данило Tue, 26 Dec 2006 23:00:26 +0000 http://www.miljan.org/main/2006/12/26/linux-nat-with-one-network-interface/#comment-296 Миљане, isn't it better to use non-root ssh tunnelling for things like port 34567? ;) Anyway, nice tips there, maybe I'll find some use for them in the future. Миљане, isn’t it better to use non-root ssh tunnelling for things like port 34567? ;)

Anyway, nice tips there, maybe I’ll find some use for them in the future.

]]>